When Radio Was Our Cricket Coach

When Radio Was Our Cricket Coach — The commentators supplied the words. We supplied the pictures.

Bat Skills Cricket Sunday Feature

There was a time when you did not need a screen to watch cricket.

You needed a radio — and an imagination.

For generations of cricket followers, particularly before television became widely accessible, radio was the medium that brought the game to them. Across the cricket-playing world the circumstances differed, but the experience was familiar.

Cricket came through radios in homes and shops, markets, bars and gathering places, and eventually through little transistor sets carried almost as closely as people carry mobile phones today. Some listeners kept them pressed against an ear because missing even one delivery seemed too much to risk.

Life continued around the cricket. People worked, travelled, shopped and talked.

But somewhere, a commentator was describing a match they could not see.

And so the listener had to build it.

The commentator supplied the words. The listener supplied the pictures.

The field itself had to be drawn in words.

“Four slips and a gully. Short leg close in. Leg slip waiting…”

Not a quotation from one particular broadcast, but the familiar language of radio cricket: cover and extra cover, mid-off and mid-on, perhaps a man pushed back to deep midwicket.

If the captain changed the field, the commentator told you who had moved and where. Gradually, you learned not only the names of the positions but why they were there. With no picture in front of you, you began placing every fielder yourself until an entire cricket ground existed inside your head.

Then the bowler turned at the top of his mark and began his run.

You could not see any of it. Yet somehow, you could.

Seeing With Our Ears

The best radio commentators did considerably more than announce runs and wickets.

A boundary was not simply four runs. How had it been struck?

A commentator might describe the balance and timing of an immaculate cover drive or on-drive. A hook might be controlled and kept down. A sweep could be played firmly along the ground.

Even defence became something worth appreciating.

A solid forward defensive stroke might be conveyed through the straightness of the bat, the closeness of bat and pad and the certainty of the movement. A delivery outside off stump could be deliberately left alone with such judgement that the young listener learned another important lesson:

Not playing a shot could itself be good batting.

These were small details, but they mattered.

The commentators were describing execution, not merely outcome.

They did the same with bowling and fielding. A brilliant stop that prevented a boundary could receive as much admiration as the stroke that threatened to produce four. Listeners learned about catches, throws, anticipation, field placement and captaincy.

Radio was quietly teaching the language of cricket.

Imagination Became Practice

For the aspiring young cricketer, listening was only the beginning.

You heard the stroke.

You imagined the stroke.

Then you tried it.

Backyards, streets and open spaces became practice grounds. A softball might be enough. When rain kept you indoors, even a ball in a sock tied with a string could provide hours of practice.

The equipment was simple.

The imagination was not.

A youngster who had heard a beautiful stroke described on the radio could spend hours attempting to reproduce it. The same applied to a forward defence, a sweep, a pull or the movement required to get back and across against pace.

Something heard through a speaker became a picture in the mind. The picture became movement. Movement became practice.

The journey was remarkably simple:

Listen → Imagine → Understand → Imitate → Practise → Learn.

Radio was not literally the only coach. Parents, teachers, older players, club cricketers, books and countless backyard contests all played their part.

But radio was often there.

And for many aspiring cricketers, it became another kind of coach.

The Voices Behind the Pictures

Every cricket culture developed voices that became inseparable from the game.

In the Caribbean, Tony Cozier became one of the defining voices of West Indies cricket. His career travelled alongside one of the game's great historical arcs: the rise of the West Indies, their extraordinary period of dominance and, eventually, the difficult years that followed.

His knowledge was immense, but the important thing was how he used it. History, statistics and observation served the cricket rather than overwhelming it.

Christopher Martin-Jenkins brought meticulous observation, historical knowledge and precision. CMJ could help listeners understand not merely the score but the cricket unfolding around it.

John Arlott, Brian Johnston and Henry Blofeld brought different qualities and unmistakably individual voices. They did not sound alike.

That was part of the pleasure.

But one story captures our theme particularly well.

Guyana's Joseph “Reds” Perreira grew up listening to the BBC and Radio Australia on shortwave. He later recalled lying in bed creating imaginary Test matches, football matches and boxing contests, commentating on events that existed only in his imagination.

He went on to commentate on 145 Test matches between 1971 and 2005.

Think about that journey.

A boy listened to radio, imagined the action and practised describing it. Years later, his own voice helped another generation imagine cricket.

Cricket Had a Memory

Radio also taught history.

During the quieter passages of a Test match, commentators could reach backwards. A player approaching a landmark might lead to the story of the person who held the record before him. A return to a famous ground could evoke an innings played there decades earlier.

Statistics were not merely numbers.

They connected the match being played to matches long finished.

That mattered because cricket is a game with memory. Today's innings means something partly because of all the innings that came before it.

The great commentators understood that. They could describe the present while keeping the past alive.

And they told stories.

Players became more than names on a scorecard. The listener learned something of their careers, struggles, personalities and journeys. The best stories entertained the lifelong supporter while quietly educating the newcomer.

Then Came the Picture

Television changed cricket broadcasting forever.

Suddenly the listener became the viewer.

The field no longer had to exist principally in the imagination. The hook could be seen. The forward defence could be replayed. Foot movement could be examined. A brilliant piece of fielding could be watched again.

Yet radio did not simply disappear when television arrived. The two overlapped for decades. Television increasingly brought cricket into living rooms while radio remained wonderfully portable. The match could travel into a shop, car, workplace, backyard or wherever daily life happened to take you.

And Richie Benaud understood particularly well that television required a different kind of commentary.

Once viewers could see the action, the commentator no longer needed to describe everything in front of them. Benaud's philosophy was that television commentary should add to what the pictures were already showing.

That provides the bridge between two eras.

Radio had to help us see what we could not see.

Television could help us understand what we could.

A Cricket Classroom for Everyone

Modern cricket broadcasting possesses tools the radio generation could scarcely have imagined.

Slow motion. Multiple camera angles. Ball tracking. Pitch maps. Wagon wheels. Statistical databases. High-speed replays and sophisticated graphics.

For the aspiring cricketer, the possibilities are extraordinary.

But pictures do not automatically produce understanding.

An experienced follower may immediately understand why a captain has brought in a fourth slip and short leg. A youngster watching their first Test match may not.

A former player may recognise why a fast bowler has changed from over the wicket to around it. The newcomer may simply see that the bowler changed sides.

A batter hooks a short ball for four. Television shows what happened.

Good commentary can explain how and why.

What was the field? What was the risk? Why was that stroke appropriate at that moment?

A spinner is attacked. Why did the batter advance?

A fielder saves four. What made the anticipation and angle of pursuit so good?

These need not become coaching lectures. They are simply moments of understanding placed naturally inside the enjoyment of watching cricket.

Speak to the newcomer without patronising the expert, and speak to the expert without forgetting the newcomer.

The lifelong supporter gets insight and history. The newcomer begins to understand the game. The aspiring cricketer quietly receives something worth taking to practice.

Not Better. Different.

This is not an argument that radio was better than television.

It was different.

Radio gave cricket description, imagination, storytelling, history and explanation.

Television gave cricket pictures, replay, data and analysis.

Modern technology has added possibilities that neither early radio nor early television possessed.

The opportunity now is not to choose between them.

It is to combine their strengths and make modern broadcasting an even richer cricket classroom.

Keep the personalities.

Keep the humour.

Keep the excitement.

Keep the stories and history.

But somewhere within all of that, keep teaching the game.

Because perhaps the greatest legacy of cricket on radio was not simply the famous voices that came through the speaker.

It was what those voices caused generations of listeners to do inside their own minds.

They listened.

They imagined.

They understood.

They imitated.

They practised.

They learned.

The commentators supplied the words. We supplied the pictures.

And perhaps modern broadcasting can help another generation do the same — this time with all the pictures in the world.

© 2026 Bat Skills Cricket. All rights reserved.

The Bat Skills Cricket Sunday Feature — stories about the people, ideas and moments that shaped the game.